MOTIVATIONAL TYPES
Motivation formulates an
organization more successfully because provoked employees are constantly
looking for improved practices to do a work, so it is essential for organization
to persuade motivation of their employees (Kalimullah
et al.,2010). Unsatisfied needs are
tensions that stimulate drives within the individual (Ramallah, 2004).
Individuals establish different organization goals to be reached. Managers must provide basic incentives for
people to accomplish their given goals.
Employee motivation
defined by Robbins (1993) is the
willingness to exert high level of efforts towards organization goals, is
conditioned by efforts and ability to satisfy some individual needs. Employers in order to motivate employees must
be able to satisfy the needs of their employees. Among financial, economic and
human resources, the latest are more essential and have the capacity to endow a
company with competitive edge as compared to others (Rizwan et al., 2010).
Employee motivation is
one of the management policies that managers use to increase effective job
management among employees in organization
(Shadare et al., 2009). Motivated
employees are believed to be more productive (Herzberg, 2003; Linder 1998; Wright, 2001). A motivated employee is responsive to the
organizations objectives which he strives to achieve to help promote the
organizations effectiveness. It is
therefore important as an organization to put in policies that will motivate
employees to be effective in their field of work.
It can also be
established that employee motivation can be intrinsic or extrinsic Bryan, Joyce & Weiss (2006); Kiger
(2006); Kehr, (2004) state that motivation can be either internal or
external, it can be viewed as push or pull determinants.
Quileyand Tymon, (2005),
intrinsic motivation is the key
motivation component of
employee empowerment and individuals are responsible for achieving their
own career success. It is based on
positively valued experiences that a person receives directly from their work
tasks such as meaningfulness, competence, choice and progress. Bryan, et al (2006);
Kiger (2006) explain that external motivators depend on
outside factors to push the individual to complete a task or project, Kehr, (2004). Extrinsic rewards are
based on reward and punishments controlled by the organization. The
organization has to encourage managers to step to the front lines and become
pragmatically involved in the day-to-day operations of the business as
possible. Many managers view themselves as being somewhat than other employees
and this viewpoint can be disastrous during difficult financial periods Quiley and TymonJr,(2005). Managers
should be creative among employees in the organization, search for ways to
improve processes and performance so it might become cheaper, faster and more
efficiency.
Managers can increase employee motivation by
seeking employees' input on daily decisions. The ability to make good decisions
should not be the sole responsibility of the managers, but a concerted effort
by individuals with the best knowledge of the situation. When employees are
encouraged to make their own decisions, managers should not micromanage, but
allow employees to learn from their mistakes and learn to tolerate some
learning errors. Other motivators that can be implemented by management include
providing social interaction and teamwork, implementing goals and challenges,
and instituting employee appreciation programs (Zimmer, 1998).
REFERENCES:
Kalimullah A. R., Yaghoubi
N. M., Moloudi J., European Journal of Economics,
Finance and Administrative Sciences 24 (2010) 165-171
Kalimullah A. R., Yaghoubi
N. M., Moloudi J., European Journal of Economics,
Finance and Administrative Sciences 24 (2010) 165-171
Kalimullah A. R., Yaghoubi
N. M., Moloudi J., European Journal of Economics,
Finance and Administrative Sciences 24 (2010) 165-171.
·
Herzberg, F,
Mausner, B&Synderman B.B (2003): The Motivation of Works (2ndedition) New
York John Wiley and Sonsinc.
·
Kalimullah A. R.,
Yaghoubi N. M., Moloudi J., European Journal of Economics, Finance and
Administrative Sciences 24 (2010) 165-171
·
Kehr, (2004).
Human Resource Information systems. Boston: PWS-Kent.
·
Kiger (2006);
Organizational Behaviour and Management, 3rdEditio
·
Quiley and Tymon Jr,(2005).
HRIS Development: A Project Team Guide to Building an Effective Personnel
Information System. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
·
Robbiun, G (1998)
Impact of Motivation on employees Performance, Journal, vol 4, issue 2, pg
22-31, MMT Publication limited
·
Ramallah, 2004,
Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York Free Press
Rizwan et al., 2010.
―Ethics, Character, and Authentic Transformational Leadership
Behavior―Leadership Quarterly:
Special Issue, PartI: Charismatic and
Transformational Leadership: Taking Stock of the Present and Future,
10(2): 181-217
·
Shadare et al.,
2009. Strategy and Human Resources: A
General Managerial Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, N.J Prentice Hall, pp.34-35
·
Zimmer, 1998).
Human Resource Management: A critical text, London, Routledge.
The role of gender in shaping achievement motivation has a long history in psychological and educational research. Early studies drew on achievement motivation theories to explain why adult women and men differed in their educational and occupational pursuits. Prior to the 1970s, men were more likely than women to obtain a college degree, pursue advanced study, and enter high-paying occupations. Over the last three decades, unprecedented changes in women’s level of educational participation and occupational status have been observed. For the first time in U.S. history, women are earning more college degrees than men, and they exceed men in many fields of study including psychology, accounting, and health-related professions (U.S. Department of Labor, 2003)
ReplyDeletecontemporary studies point to gender differences in achievement motivation. According to J. S. Hyde and K. C. Kling (2001) the increase of achievement motivation of women was probably caused by better opportunities to gain education and also to find employment. Similar findings were also reported by B. A. Greene, T. K. DeBacker (2004), who state in their study that in the 1960s men and women differed more significantly in long-term goals and future plans. Men expressed mainly plans concerning a career in sciences and technologies and also gaining
Delete3 prestige and good earnings. Women focused more on personal comfort and altruistic behaviour in the future.